In un-shock-horror-news, vitamin D deficiency – a state mumbling-ly acknowledged as immunodeficiency – is thought to help the immunodeficiency caused by “HIV”. But when not deficient, “HIV” has a harder time expressing itself. So, in some cases at least, the core immunodeficiency to worry about is vitamin D dearth; and given that “HIV” is not proven to do anything, vitamin D is one of those things, like good food and clean water access, and abstention from hard drug use, that really makes or breaks the immune system.
Read the article here.
Then buy my book, perhaps?
Reuters reports on a new study which connects HIV-positivity with societal issues. Unfortunately, the virus hypothesis is not divorced.
In unrelated news, a video has recently appeared online in which Dr Peter Gotzsche of the Nordic Cochrane Centre (Cochrane produces detailed reports on all the literature available on a subject) condemns mammography as being a risky procedure which provides little benefit. Gotzche shares an experience with Peter Duesberg in regards to censorship of an article:
In 2006 a paper by Gøtzsche on mammography screening was electronically published in the European Journal of Cancer ahead of print. The journal later removed the paper completely from the journal website without any formal retraction. The paper was later published in Danish Medical Bulletin with a short note from the editor, and Gøtzsche and his co-authors commented on the unilateral retraction that the authors were not involved in.
Additionally, Rethinking AIDS President, David Crowe, has interviewed Gotzsche previously. Listen here.